Foz's enthusiasm is plainly undimmed in spite of the wet weather programme during the 1989 season in this picture from Jill Hummerstone. The Neolithic bank is in the foreground and the entrance and the Iron Age rampart in the distance. Even in poor visibility I would imagine Foz could have been seen from Leckhampton and quite possibly further afield.
Showing posts with label 1989. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1989. Show all posts
Monday, November 16, 2009
Monday, October 5, 2009
Dig unearths ancient times
My thanks to Joanne Milroy who writes "Last year - at the 2008 Reunion - Pauline Dumbrill gave me a file of newspaper cuttings and other material that had belonged to Don Mickley who had served as Chairman of the Friends and had recently died. Here is a feature in the Cheltenham AdMag to mark the famous Royal Visit to mark the 20th Anniversary of Crickley. Very bizarrely when I was scanning these articles in on the heavy duty office scanner - one of my colleagues said "Crickley Hill?....my sister dug there." Perhaps someone remembers an Imogen Bush in 1990/91 - I work with her sister Magdalen. There was an Imogen in earlier years - who was Julian Thomas's sister, I think - but this seems to be another one."
"HRH the Duke of Gloucester visited the Crickley Hill Archaeological Dig, on Monday, stamping the royal seal of approval on 21 years [sic] hard digging. After arriving by helicopter the Duke was presented with a replica bronze cape pin found on the site [Really? Why wasn't it with the rest of the finds?] and was then shown around the excavations by Dr Philip Dixon who is the director of the project. During his tour the Duke viewed a mysterious long mound on the hill, believed to have had a ritual purpose in prehistoric times, a sacred circle and a cremation burial site. He also talked to supervisors and volunteers about Iron Age remains and watched them sift through the soil for fossils or pottery. [Iron Age fossils?] "As an architect, the Duke was particularly interested in the type of houses they lived in,"His visit is indeed a tribute to the 4,000 volunteers who have worked on the dig for 21 years." The Duke said "This is a very interesting project which has brought so many people together and at the same time it builds up our knowledge about our prehistoric forebearers [sic]." [Eh?] Crickley Hill, a nine acre site has rewarded archaeologists with a range of finds over two decades of work. Among the finds have been the earliest battlefield in this country, dating from 2,500 BC, a neoloithic [sic] causewayed enclosure, a Bronze Age ceremonial site and two Iron Age hillforts and a Dark Age Chieftain's settlement. [Each of those finds must have been a struggle to get into a plastic finds bag. I wonder where Richard found some big enough ...] This year's excavations, which began on 1 July, will concentrate on two areas of the hill. At the western end of the site the dig team will try to unravel the history of the prehistoric long mound with its related sacred circle and burial site. to the east of this the team will also be investigating the remains of an Iron Age village which dates from 700BC to 450BC. The dig, which this year is sponsored by the Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society, is open to the public every day except Thursday."
"HRH the Duke of Gloucester visited the Crickley Hill Archaeological Dig, on Monday, stamping the royal seal of approval on 21 years [sic] hard digging. After arriving by helicopter the Duke was presented with a replica bronze cape pin found on the site [Really? Why wasn't it with the rest of the finds?] and was then shown around the excavations by Dr Philip Dixon who is the director of the project. During his tour the Duke viewed a mysterious long mound on the hill, believed to have had a ritual purpose in prehistoric times, a sacred circle and a cremation burial site. He also talked to supervisors and volunteers about Iron Age remains and watched them sift through the soil for fossils or pottery. [Iron Age fossils?] "As an architect, the Duke was particularly interested in the type of houses they lived in,"His visit is indeed a tribute to the 4,000 volunteers who have worked on the dig for 21 years." The Duke said "This is a very interesting project which has brought so many people together and at the same time it builds up our knowledge about our prehistoric forebearers [sic]." [Eh?] Crickley Hill, a nine acre site has rewarded archaeologists with a range of finds over two decades of work. Among the finds have been the earliest battlefield in this country, dating from 2,500 BC, a neoloithic [sic] causewayed enclosure, a Bronze Age ceremonial site and two Iron Age hillforts and a Dark Age Chieftain's settlement. [Each of those finds must have been a struggle to get into a plastic finds bag. I wonder where Richard found some big enough ...] This year's excavations, which began on 1 July, will concentrate on two areas of the hill. At the western end of the site the dig team will try to unravel the history of the prehistoric long mound with its related sacred circle and burial site. to the east of this the team will also be investigating the remains of an Iron Age village which dates from 700BC to 450BC. The dig, which this year is sponsored by the Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society, is open to the public every day except Thursday."
Photo captions:
The Duke hears something of the long history of the site from dig director Dr Philip Dixon and area supervisor Sue Content
The Duke learns something of flint working from archaeologist John Gale
Worker meticulously mark every find and carefully sweep away the dirt as the Duke poses some searching questions of his own [Groan ...]
The Duke admires a memento of his visit, a replica Bronze Age pin
Labels:
1989,
Bronze Age,
Content,
Dixon,
Duke of Gloucester,
Dumbrill,
Gale,
Iron Age,
Mickley
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Arwel rides out ...
For those Crickley blog readers who might miss Arwel Barrett on Facebook: magnificent! Now why did Arwel never turn up at Crickley on a horse? Next year at the reunion, England expects that every man ...
Update from JAB himself: "Unfortunately CHM is wrong. One year I did bring my horse to Crickley. She lived in the field opposite the camp for a week or so. I am guessing that it was either '89 or '90. I'd need to do a bit of research to pin it down any more precisely. As an aside that horse was the dam of the coloured one in this picture." I just wish I'd been there to meet her.
Update from JAB himself: "Unfortunately CHM is wrong. One year I did bring my horse to Crickley. She lived in the field opposite the camp for a week or so. I am guessing that it was either '89 or '90. I'd need to do a bit of research to pin it down any more precisely. As an aside that horse was the dam of the coloured one in this picture." I just wish I'd been there to meet her.
Friday, May 15, 2009
The BGAS 1989 report
A further abstract from the transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, this time from the 1989 season as follows:
"COBERLEY/BADGEWORTH, Crickley Hill, SO927161. During the 20th season of excavations a straight line of burnt hearths was found below the long mound, surrounded by very large number of finds, pottery, flint and bone. The area is interpreted as a communal kitchen, of the final phase of the Neolithic settlement. To the south of the entrance it was found that the buildings of the round-house settlement were confined to a strip about 15 m broad behind the rampart. To the west lay two rows of square structures, their post holes containing barley grains, which seemed to be an extension of the zone of granaries of the hillfort settlement. Towards the south of the excavated area, two-face hearth was dated by remnant magnetism to 1 BC +/- 2 years. Nearby a penannular brooch and smooth, black, late-looking pottery were found. Within the ramparts a quarry hollow, used as a rubbish tip during the last occupation of the hillfort, produced quantities of pottery and animal bone. The hollow had ultimately been utilised as the floor of a small hut, walled in stone. The structure resembles the sub-Roman/Dark Age buildings found 80 m to the south in the lee of the rampart. Several sherds of Roman greyware were uncovered immediately to the west of it."
The date seems curiously, nay perhaps even spuriously, precise... one suspects a typographical error?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







