Friday, February 12, 2010
Spot the bow ties
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Southwood by the huts
Monday, December 21, 2009
Max Glaskin & the Irvines in 1977
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Relaxing in Cheltenham ...
Thursday, November 26, 2009
Sitting on the step
Monday, November 2, 2009
No prizes for guessing the year ...
Thursday, October 15, 2009
The management 1977
Thursday, October 8, 2009
When I go Elsan-cleaning ...
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
1977: Robin's ditch
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
All smiles at lunch in 1977
The butler joke Max told went something like this: "An English Lord had a butler named Wibble. One very hot summer's day, his Lordship summoned Wibble and said, "Wibble, would you run my bath, please?" "Certainly, my Lord," replied Wibble. "Will there be anything else, my Lord?" "Yes, Wibble, please see that some cool clothes are laid out after the bath. It's confoundedly warm." "Indeed it is, my Lord. Certainly, my Lord. Your Lordship's linen suit, I think. Will there be anything else, my Lord?" "Yes, Wibble, please tell her Ladyship I will dine at my club." "Of course, my Lord" "Anything else, my Lord?" "That will be all. Get on with running the bath, man."
Wibble ran the bath, told his Lordship it was ready and, having escorted him to his bath, hovered nearby in case there were any further instructions. "Will there be anything else my lord?" "This bath is not too hot is it, Wibble?" "No, my Lord, I have checked the temperature by dipping my elbow in it. Your Lordship will not be scalded. Will there be anything else my lord?" "No, Wibble. If I require anything else I shall call you." With that, his Lordship lowered himself into the water and let out a long, loud fart.

"But my Lord, you asked for a hot water-bottle." "I most certainly did not! Why would I order a hot water-bottle on a day like this?" "But you did, my Lord. As you lowered yourself into your bath this morning, I distinctly heard you say, "Whadabowdawadderboddlewibble?"" © Max Glaskin 1977 and Julian Parker 2009.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
A supervisor doing some work ...
In my Delon picture, and indeed in the previously-posted picture of me posing rather too camply on the barrow baulk at West Heath Common, I note that I am wearing one of my mother's hand-knitted jumpers, the last of which sadly succumbed to a moth infestation in the mid-1980s. Much like my hair."
Monday, July 27, 2009
A youthful Ferris throws a shape ...
Sunday, July 19, 2009
I'd rather hoped this one hadn't survived ...
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Bob Alvey as ever hunting molluscs ...
Monday, June 1, 2009
More from Crickley Hill and Gloucestershire Prehistory
Thanks to Philip Dixon and the Crickley Hill Trust for permission to reproduce the following abstract from " Crickley Hill and Gloucestershire Prehistory", published in 1977:
"Later Developments
Changes meanwhile occurred in the settlements of Gloucestershire. A new group of hill forts was built to the north, on Bredon Hill and the adjacent Cotswolds slopes. No radiocarbon dates are available, but their pottery belongs to the 4th and 3rd century and later, and closely resembles the material from the forts of the Malverns and Herefordshire: the influences in the area seem to have shifted from east to west. A discovery of great significance has recently been made at Beckford, near Bredon, where rescue excavations, in advance of gravel workings, have exposed parts of the large lowland settlement, whose houses were set within a regular grid of rectangular boundary ditches. The arrangement resembles that at Dragonby, Lincs., and is the first clear occurrence of an eastern flat settlement in the West, an area otherwise dominated by hillforts. The Beckford pottery is identical to that from the tiny fort at Conderton nearby, which can thus plausibly be seen as the citadel of the otherwise unfortified village. No open settlement is yet known which might have been associated with the Crickley Hill fort.
Farther south, the small hill fort at Painswick Beacon, with its multiple lines of banks and ditches, is of a type associated with the latest Iron Age, but no dates are available for the site. During the first century AD and new centre of settlement was formed at Bagendon, near Cirencester, a tribal capital 200 acres in extent within its banks, the predecessor of the Roman town. An important family must have lived near Crickley at this period, for road making between Crickley and Birdlip in 1879 revealed a small cemetery of the early 1st century AD, whose rich grave goods are now displayed in
Further
E. M. Clifford Bagendon (1961)
C. Green 'The Birdlip Early Iron Age Burials', Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society XV (1949)
W. Britnell 'Beckford', Current Archaeology 45 (1974)
J. Dyer Southern
Sunday, March 22, 2009
The Second Hillfort
Sunday, January 18, 2009
The First Hillfort
The houses so far uncovered (in about one third of the fort's total area) could perhaps have accommodated from 50 to 200 people: there is no way of estimating the density of settlement in the unexcavated area. This community survived long enough to wear down the entrance roadway, but had gone, it seems, before the replacement of rotten timber in its houses became necessary: one generation, then, or two at the most. The end was clearly abrupt. The gates were burned, the walls slighted, and the houses destroyed by fire."
Sunday, January 11, 2009
Jim Irvine finds a reference to Crickley Hill in 'The Times' ...
Thursday, January 1, 2009
Happy New Year! Even if it's a trifle chilly ...
Saturday, November 15, 2008
The Neolithic Period at Crickley Hill
Again, by kind permission of Professor Dixon: the Neolithic section of "Crickley Hill and Gloucestershire Prehistory":
"The first farming communities in
The first major occupation at Crickley was a causewayed enclosure of this sort. Two lines of interrupted ditches cut off the low knoll in the centre of the promontory. Behind each line ran a bank, built of the stone taken from the ditch, through which at least two entrances had been built. The inner ditches had been filled in, and were then partially recut and backfilled several times, a process which implies a lengthy but perhaps intermittent use of the site. Other activities were doubtless practised within the enclosure, and Neolithic pits and has been too obscured by later prehistoric occupation to reveal the site's first function.
Whatever its precise form, the new work was defensive and presumably enclosed the settlement.
Other sites to see
The fortified enclosure at Crickley is so far paralleled in















