Sunday, May 31, 2009
The long grass at Ullenwood in black and white
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Savage 1988 6: Interlude: Priest and People
My thanks, as ever, to Richard Savage and the Crickley Hill Trust for permission to reproduce abstracts from his 1988 booklet "Village Fortress Shrine: Crickley Hill Gloucestershire 3500 BC -AD500". Today the the section dealing with the Long Mound.
6 Interlude: Priest and People
c. 2500 - 1000 BC
The last Neolithic settlement was destroyed well before 2000 BC, and for more than a thousand years there was no permanent occupation of the hill. But its use as a religious centre continue for at least part of that time; at present we have no means of establishing a certain date for its end.
The Neolithic shrine and the path approaching it were modified, the shrine being incorporated in a small stone circle whose centre, a burnt area, was almost exactly above the hearth which was presumably the focus of the old rituals. Part of the path was covered with a stone cairn. This supported very odd fence lines which defined cells, stalls or even short lengths of passage. Later, in a final rearrangement, the circle was rebuilt, with a stone slab over its central hearth, and the slab itself was burnt on its upper surface, with many fragments of burnt bone scattered about it. The cairn covering the approach road was covered and extended by a mound of turf and topsoil nearly 100 m long, with a pole erected at its eastern end and its sides marked out at intervals by large stone slabs, some covering butchered animal bones. Cobbling and trampled stone suggest that processions moved beside the mound, outside its stones, and continued both inside and outside the circle.
We are looking at an important religious centre, whose rituals involve animal sacrifice with elaborate ceremonies. We do not at present know where its priesthood or their congregation lived; it seems likely that it was not on the hill itself.
[Illustration: a beaker from Crickley Hill. The shape, decoration and fabric are characteristic of the transition from the Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age. Height about 15cm]
The sacred area may have been defined by a small trench, 40 cm wide and deep, which contained only burnt stone and earth, cut in the silt of the final Neolithic ditch. The processional way, today visible as the long mound, lies at the bottom of the natural hollow which conceals it and the circle at its western end. Outside the sacred area, only watchers standing in a small zone on the southern side of the hill could have a sight of activity on the mound, and their view was, it seems, interrupted by short fence held up by three posts to the east of it. In fact, the whole ritual complex would have been hidden from anyone on the hill outside the boundary, although the smoke of the fire in the stone circle would have been visible throughout much of the Severn Vale. One might guess that the occurrence of ritual practice was intended to be public, but its details were kept entirely secret.
[Illustration: The shrine and its processional way in their first post-neolithic form K. Hajichristou]
It is likely that this final phase was a ritual site of the earlier part of the Bronze Age, perhaps in the centuries after 2000 BC, but it may be only a coincidence that the best place from which the initiated (discreetly removed well out of earshot) might see the ceremonies is 700 m due east of the long mound, on high ground, where there is a small group of early Bronze Age burial mounds.
[Plan: the relationship between the shrine, the processional way and the round barrows of Emma's Grove (on private ground)]
[Illustration: casting an axe head in the early Bronze Age. P. Saxby]
The use of this temple site came to an abrupt end. The great slab in the centre of the circle was smashed. The stones of the circle itself were pushed over. All but one were driven inwards; those involved seem to recognize the power of the circle, and destroyed it while themselves standing outside. The hilltop was now abandoned, and grass slowly covered its monuments.
Friday, May 29, 2009
Boden on Lash
"Herr Blogmeister, the Boden archive used to extend further - I once had a good selection from 1980, but lent them to someone many years ago and never saw them again. [Who was it? Let's track 'em down?] Anything else, not sure.... I have thousands of slides, the Pentax became the Nikon, and I continued to use this medium until CCD technology overtook the resolution of the best quality film early in this millennium.
A propos of the recent Captain Lash postings, the copy that still somehow resides on my bookshelves was the basis of the proposed stage version, fully annotated as the prototype script in a hand which I know isn't Ferris's so must presumably be Philpotts or yourself. For example, Cocky's concertina has become a recorder, and textual alterations such as "He began to rave, ripping out a - 'torrent of filthy lingua franca' (replaced by) 'Giant JP!' - that would have curdled the blood of Cora had she understood it." Maybe an important and iconic copy for the Lash aficionados - perhaps I should stick it up on eBay and let them fight amongst themselves for it!!!!
Finally, I still possess my old WHS trowels and have used them again relatively recently for their properly designed purpose - ie repointing old brickwork."
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Looking West
C-H-M and Dr Ferris are caught short ...
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Is this a ticklish question from Andrew Powell or a rash one?
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Dr Phillpotts provides an erudite commentary ...
Further to some other recent posts, the shot of Sylvie was taken up the photographic tower. I was also up the tower when I took the picture of PWD returning from the peeing tree, with a 200m zoom lense. As he heard the shutter click, Phil raised two fingers to me in jocular salute.
I much appreciated the shot of Jill Hummerstone in action on the serving counter, but I wonder if the double drainer metal sink is in fact a 1980s replacement of the original arrangement, which I fancy may have been single, deep and ceramic. Also in the 1980s refurbishment the whole stage and the piano was lost. Does no one have a picture of the mural that was on the back panel of the stage facing the kitchen? It featured King Kong holding Big Ben, and I believe it was painted by Pat Anderson's sisters c1972.
The unreleased Troubled Bridge over Water was from our GG and the Wart Removers phase, when we really were a duo and Andrew Powell was lost in space. It featured an extended cut of Jordanian Woman and our nod to the English pastoral tradition, Walking to Hampton Homosexual. Sadly the master tapes are lost, but perhaps if you can remember what BAWB sounded like, you weren't really in it."
Monday, May 25, 2009
Andrew Powell muses ...
Andrew himself says: "All this nostalgia gets me to reminiscing. Your blog says over 3000 people have dug at Crickley and while I am sure there is something about the Crickley Hill experience that most of us share - a common feeling about the place, the archaeology, the people, particularly Phil, even about the Ullenwood ablutions, I am also certain that each person has a different story to tell about what that experience meant.
When I first went to Crickley, for two weeks in 1971 (I think), I had just left school and was planning to study Scots law. This was my first experience of archaeology, and each subsequent summer while at university I came back to Crickley, where I met the likes of Ferris, Phillpotts, Boden, Roberts and many others, all of whom seemed to be having much more fun studying archaeology than I was, studying law.
It slowly dawned on me that I was on the wrong career path, and after graduating I finally decided that a legal career was not for me (much to the relief I think of the Edinburgh solicitors who had offered me an apprenticeship – given my sober and respectable appearance at the time).
However, with help and advice from Phil, including a very complimentary “To whom it may concern” reference (that I still have), I first got my first professional job in archaeology digging in Glasgow, and eventually a place at university to study archaeology. So Crickley was literally a life-changing experience for me – thanks to which I am a now highly remunerated, fat-cat archaeologist, rather than just another impoverished Scottish lawyer. Ho hum.
Has anyone mentioned the 1972 Fisher-Spassky World Chess Championship, which I remember being followed with great interest at Ullenwood? I recall there were a number of quite good chess players there; I was not one of them but I got quite interested. Or, a few years later, the group who, incomprehensibly (to many of us), would play Dungeons and Dragons every evening rather than amble down to the Air Balloon for a quick half of shandy."
Sunday, May 24, 2009
The Guardian crossword, 1972
Saturday, May 23, 2009
Fourth Report, 1972: Part V
Today, with thanks to PWD for permission, the final part of the Fourth Report from 1972:
"The Period 3 Settlement
The total diameter of the roundhouse was about 14.8 m. A number of post holes whose dating is uncertain lay within the circle. Some may belong to partitions at the west end of House 2 of Period 2: postholes 522, 541 and 542 probably associated with the roundhouse, but none were substantial enough to have held up the roof. No central support was possible, for a hearth lay in the middle of the house, and while roof supporting posts might have rested on the ground surface (producing a tower-like structure similar to that proposed for Little Woodbury roundhouse (Bersu, 1940) no evidence of this is likely to be forthcoming. Like the roundhouses of similar size, and apparently similar construction, at Pimperne or Longbridge Deveril, the roof construction of the Crickley roundhouse is problematic.
To the south west of House 4 two small hearths were surrounded by clusters of small postholes. Further holes, both small and large, lay to the south of the roundhouse and to the north of House 1. For none are there adequate grounds to allow period attribution, and all are shown in figure 5 as of uncertain period. The excellent preservation of the hearths might suggest ascription to the final phase of occupation, and this, more tentatively, might be indicated by the undue proximity of one of the structures to the front of House 5. The post holes around hearth 801 could be seen as a trapezoidal building: heavy burning to the south of the hearth had reduced the bedrock to quicklime, an intense heat that suggests some industrial function from the building. The internal post holes were perhaps to support a frame around hearth itself. No clear pattern can be made of the post holes in other areas, and, as flimsy shelters, drying racks or similar two or more pos-structures, some may belong to the Period 2 and others too are shown for convenience, on the Period 3 plan (figure 6).
If the Period 3a defences are correctly interpreted as a temporary re-fortification of the hilltop after the Period 2 destruction (
Discussion
The decorated sherds of fine fabric with incised linear ornament (illustrated and described in
This break in the ceramic tradition, whatever interpretation be put upon it, should therefore be placed between Period 2 and Period 3a, a period which saw the change from longhouse to roundhouse, and also from daub filled with grit to clean sifted daub in the wattling of these buildings.
Comparanda for the pottery should be treated with caution in view of the paucity of the material. The closest parallels for the sherds of the latest period appear to come from the Upper Thames (references given in Dixon 1971), in context now ascribed to the initial stages of the Iron Age and dated not later than the sixth century BC (Harding, 1972). The cultural context of the longhouses is at present quite uncertain. Analysis of strata deposited by erosion between Period 2 and Period 3a indicated no considerable time-span (Dixon, 1970) but calibration of this in terms of years, decades or even centuries is hardly possible.
The longhouses themselves are of a type seldom recognized in
Future work
In 1973 we shall continue the excavation of the area behind the entrance, and hope to reveal more of both the longhouse and the roundhouse settlements. The work requires volunteers and adequate financing to augment the generous support of the
References
Bersu, 1940: ‘Excavation at Little Woodbury’, Proc. Prehist.Soc. VI
Harding, 1972: The Iron Age in the
Soudsky, 1969: ‘Etude de la maison Neolithique’, Slovenska Archaeologia XVII
Stanford, 1970: ‘Credenhill Camp…’ Arch. Journal CXVII
Waterbolk, 1964: ‘The Bronze Age Settlement of Elp’ Helinium 4
Wolseley et al, 1925: ‘Prehistoric and Roman Settlements on Park Brow’ Archaeologia LXXVI"
Friday, May 22, 2009
Dr Ferris reminisces ...
John Boden frames Andrew Powell
Thursday, May 21, 2009
CHM's first supervisor: Mr Simon Mercer
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Lunch in 1993
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
How many diggers can you squeeze into one cutting?
Readers' letters
A Dr Iain M. Ferris of Birmingham writes: "I was pleased to see the recent posting on your blog of a picture of a very hirsute Clive Anderson demonstrating the correct use of a Killaspray. I wonder if Crickley Hill Man has any other photographs of such a machine in operation on the hill, perhaps also operated by a man with an equally retro hairstyle." Of course I do. Here he is. |